DE

7TOTAL

7OFFICIAL SOURCES

3TOPIC AREAS

Court Case7

Generative AIJudicial & Law EnforcementLiability & Accountability

Court Case✓ Official

Beschluss 4 L 3030/25

Pro Se Litigant appeared before the Köln. Misrepresented: Case Law | Antragsteller führt vermeintlich ergangene Entscheidungen des OVG NRW an, zitiert diese aber fehlerhaft; Gericht hält dies für ein Zeichen ungeprüfter KI‑Ergebnisse.

Court: KölnParty: Pro Se Litigant

14 November 2025Judicial & Law EnforcementGenerative AILiability & Accountability

↗ Link available

Court Case✓ Official

Case 19 O 527/16

Expert appeared before the LG Darmstadt. Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions Outcome: Expert fees reduced to naught.

Court: LG DarmstadtParty: Expert

10 November 2025Judicial & Law EnforcementGenerative AILiability & Accountability

↗ Link available

Court Case✓ Official

Beschluss 2-13 S 56/24

Lawyer used Unidentified in proceedings before the LG Frankfurt a. M.. False Quotes: Case Law | verbatim quotations from the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) that did not even exist

Court: LG Frankfurt a. M.Party: LawyerTool: Unidentified

25 September 2025Judicial & Law EnforcementGenerative AILiability & Accountability

↗ Link available

Court Case✓ Official

3 ORbs 164/25

Lawyer appeared before the KG Berlin. Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Factually incorrect submissions

Court: KG BerlinParty: Lawyer

25 August 2025Judicial & Law EnforcementGenerative AILiability & Accountability

↗ Link available

Court Case✓ Official

VGH 3 S 1012/25; VG 2 K 1899/25

Lawyer appeared before the VGH Baden-Württemberg. Fabricated: Case Law | Applicants cited a multitude of non-findable decisions and claimed higher-court jurisprudence that, as far as the court could see, does not exist; the court noted this and treated the complaint as lacking substantive engagement.

Court: VGH Baden-WürttembergParty: Lawyer

8 July 2025Judicial & Law EnforcementGenerative AILiability & Accountability

↗ Link available

Court Case✓ Official

Cologne District Court, 312 F 130/25

Lawyer appeared before the Cologne District Court (Family Court). Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Court found citation to 'Viefhues' in a Munich commentary and marginal nos. (9th ed. 2021, marginal no. 65 ff.) to be incorrect and fictitious; actual commentary and edition details differ. Outcome: Court admonished the attorney and warned that knowingly disseminating untruths may violate BRAO §43a(3).

Court: Cologne District Court (Family Court)Party: Lawyer

2 July 2025Judicial & Law EnforcementGenerative AILiability & Accountability

↗ Link available

Court Case✓ Official

Beschluss 5 U 1/25

Lawyer appeared before the OLG Celle. Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited an OLG München decision (12.11.2015, 23 U 2003/15) which the court found to be a Fehlzitat and not retrievable on juris or beck-online. Outcome: Court treated the cited authorities as Fehlzitate (not verifiable) and did not rely on them.

Court: OLG CelleParty: Lawyer

29 April 2025Judicial & Law EnforcementGenerative AILiability & Accountability

↗ Link available